We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

California Attorney General brings action against Standard and Poor's

  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2013

On February 5, the Attorney General of California, Kamala D. Harris, filed suit in Superior Court in California against Standard & Poor's and its

General counsel update

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • China, European Union, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Mongolia, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 11 2012

This is the thirtieth in our series of general counsel updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

Financial services report, spring 2012

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2012

A huge solar storm hit this winter, dumping enough energy in two days to power every residence in New York City for two years

Supreme Court to decide antitrust immunity of investment banks

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2007

The US Supreme Court will decide whether underwriters of certain technology firms’ initial public offerings (IPOs) can be held liable under the federal antitrust laws for allegedly conspiring to inflate aftermarket prices of the offered securities