We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Judges take the lead in controlling electronic discovery cost and complexity with new proposed procedures and discovery orders

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2011

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are based on the fundamental proposition that litigation should be “administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.”

Supreme Court unanimously upholds clear and convincing evidence standard for invalidating patents in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2011

Last week the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in a closely-watched case in which Microsoft Corporation sought to overturn a significant jury verdict of patent infringement against it by challenging the high threshold the district court, following years of common law precedent, had applied to Microsoft's claims that the patent in suit was invalid

Raising the bar on proving damages - Uniloc vs. Microsoft

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2011

“A reasonable royalty is the predominant measure of damages in patent infringement cases.”

Antitrust causation in Standard Setting Organizations

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2010

While Standard Setting Organizations ("SSOs") and the technical standards they promulgate for various industries are essential to the operation of the competitive marketplace, they give rise to unique circumstances that can raise significant competitive concerns