We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 280

Motions to expunge: a different perspective than a motion to seal

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

In RPX Corp. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00171 (Paper 62, September 9, 2014), the PTAB denied RPX's motion to expunge from the permanent record all

Federal Circuit on damages: Virnetx, Inc., Science Applications International Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc. and Apple Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2014)

  • Merchant & Gould
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 25 2014

In its recent decision in VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, the Federal Circuit clarified the standard for determining damages in a patent infringement

Early lessons on Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International and Section 101 from recent court decisions

  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2014

In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), the US Supreme Court held that claims to “generic computer implementation” of

According to the Patent Office, claiming an abstract idea may still be patentable, will anyone else agree?

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2014

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the Office) issued interim guidelines to its Examiners following the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous decision in

Airline rewards conversion method invalid under Alice and Bilski

  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2014

On September 2, 2014, Federal Circuit Judge William Bryson, sitting by designation in the Eastern District of Texas, ruled that two patents on a

Defendants successfully challenge patent eligibility under rule 101 prior to claim construction

  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2014

The District of Delaware and the Central District of California have both recently invalidated patents under 35 U.S.C. 101 without first

Post-Alice Corp. decisions show increased trend of courts invalidating computerized business method patents

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2014

Previously, we reported on the US Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573__ U.S. 2014, which held that certain systems

Supreme Court holds abstract ideas implemented on generic computer ineligible

  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2014

A unanimous Supreme Court has held that merely requiring a generic computer to implement an abstract idea fails to transform the abstract idea into a

Supreme Court unanimously affirms Federal Circuit CLS Bank decision

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2014

The Supreme Court has affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision holding that the method, computer-readable medium and system claims at issue in Alice v

What does the Supreme Court ruling in Alice v. CLS mean to a software entrepreneur?

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

The Supreme Court’s ruling against broadly claimed software patents in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank leaves many questions on patent eligibility unanswered