We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 272

Supreme Court unanimously affirms Federal Circuit CLS Bank decision

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2014

The Supreme Court has affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision holding that the method, computer-readable medium and system claims at issue in Alice v

What does the Supreme Court ruling in Alice v. CLS mean to a software entrepreneur?

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

The Supreme Court’s ruling against broadly claimed software patents in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank leaves many questions on patent eligibility unanswered

Supreme Court rules on computer software patent claims

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

A recent decision of the United States Supreme Court may make it more difficult for inventors to obtain patents on computer software. Patent

Patent practitioner considerations for drafting software patents based on covered business method review holdings

  • Merchant & Gould
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2014

In Bilski v. Kappos, the Supreme Court’s holding resulted in some software and business method patents no longer being valid (561 U.S. 593, 2010). In

Injunction and civil contempt remedy vacated after PTO cancels claim in reexamination

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Addressing whether an injunction and civil contempt were proper after the sole claim on which the injunction was based was cancelled, the U.S. Court

Inherency is tough to proveeven in IPR

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In four final written decisions in Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenges, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) concluded that the petitioner had

First application of Alice Corp. decision to covered business method patent review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

In determining whether a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review should be instituted, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) referred to the

On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related

Identifying class of algorithms insufficient to satisfy means-plus-function structure requirement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Addressing whether a patent specification provided adequate specificity to satisfy indefiniteness scrutiny of a means-plus-function claim, the U.S

Indemnity agreement does not equate to a “real party in interest” to create time-bar for inter partes review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB, the Board) has concluded that an inter partes review of a patent is not time-barred if a petition was filed