Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 51

It continues: Sirtex awarded over $2.5 million in UWA v Gray cross-claim

Davies Collison Cave
-
Australia
-
July 12 2010

The Federal Court recently handed down the latest judgment (University of Western Australia v Gray (No 29) 2010 FCA 665) in the long-running matter of UWA v Gray, which we have covered in previous In Brief updates

Protecting ownership of your intellectual property: the importance of employment agreements

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
-
USA
-
October 27 2010

A recent decision from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal, Stanford University v. Roche, 583 F.3d 832 (Fed. Cir. 2009), highlights the importance of employment agreements in protecting the ownership of intellectual property

Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower complaint dismissed for failure to enumerate basis of statutory protection

Epstein Becker Green
-
USA
-
November 1 2010

An in-house patent attorney who protested that his employer knowingly assigned a $50 million value to acquire patents alleged to be worthless could not link his discharge to whistleblower activity protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

US Supreme Court grants certiorari in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

Mayer Brown LLP
-
USA
-
November 2 2010

Each year, the U.S. government provides billions of dollars in federal funding for research

Employee inventions: sharing the profits

Nabarro LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
February 24 2011

An employee who made an invention in respect of which his employer secured a patent was entitled to a fair share of the employer's £23m actual royalties

Protecting your ownership of employee-created intellectual property

Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
-
USA
-
July 23 2010

Most employers assume that any intellectual property ("IP") created by an employee in connection with the employee's job duties will automatically become the exclusive property of the employer

Unilever plc v Ian Alexander Shanks: calculating employee compensation

McDermott Will & Emery
-
United Kingdom
-
January 25 2011

Professor Shanks made an invention patented by his employer, Unilever UK Central Resources Ltd (CRL

Unilever plc & others v Shanks: employee invention compensation to be measured by reference to actual benefits to employer rather than hypothetical benefits

Bird & Bird
-
United Kingdom
-
January 31 2011

The Court of Appeal (Longmore and Jacob LJJ and Kitchin J) recently addressed (2010 EWCA Civ 1283) the meaning of the words "that person" in section 41(2) Patents Act 1977 in the context of a long-running dispute over an inventor's entitlement to compensation from his employer where the patent has been of outstanding benefit to the employer

Stanford v. Roche: highlighting the importance of best practices for employee assignments

Hogan Lovells
-
USA
-
April 21 2011

On February 28, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Case No. 09-1159, wherein the parties sparred over the scope of a federal contractor university's statutory right to elect to retain title to a "subject invention" under the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. 200-212

£23 million of patent royalties - but who benefits, employee or employer?

Mills & Reeve LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
March 4 2011

For Cambridge businesses involved in leading edge technology the issue of ownership of inventions is fundamental to their business

next >

Search results

It continues: Sirtex awarded over $2.5 million in UWA v Gray cross-claim

Protecting ownership of your intellectual property: the importance of employment agreements

Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower complaint dismissed for failure to enumerate basis of statutory protection

US Supreme Court grants certiorari in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

Employee inventions: sharing the profits

Protecting your ownership of employee-created intellectual property

Unilever plc v Ian Alexander Shanks: calculating employee compensation

Unilever plc & others v Shanks: employee invention compensation to be measured by reference to actual benefits to employer rather than hypothetical benefits

Stanford v. Roche: highlighting the importance of best practices for employee assignments

£23 million of patent royalties - but who benefits, employee or employer?

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea