We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 120

China newsletter - summer 2013

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • China, Macau
  • -
  • July 17 2013

For the purpose of fully implementing the spirit of the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China and attracting more foreign

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Is “insolubly ambiguous” the correct standard to determine compliance with Sec 112?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on a petition challenging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's standard for determining when

Emerging trends: competing policy issues at stake in the Supreme Court’s review of Akamai v. Limelight

  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2014

On April 30, the Supreme Court of the United States reviewed the Federal Circuit's decision in Akamai Technologies, Inc v. Limelight Networks, Inc

Will the public suffer? Let’s stay!

  • Carpmaels & Ransford LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 17 2014

The recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc shows that the UK courts are

Beyond borders: the power to block the international flow of digital files

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 3 2014

With the advance of digital technology, courts are being forced to deal with the legal ramifications beyond the borders of the United States. In a

Ultramercial v. Hulu: Federal Circuit affirms district court’s dismissal of patent lawsuit for a patent claiming an abstract idea

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 20 2014

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which outlines the steps for determining whether a patent claiming

Software patent abstraction hits social media platforms

  • Ober Kaler
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2015

The process of creating “link relationships” between documents and personal profiles used by Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms

Avoiding PTAB sanctions just play by the rules

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Despite having the authority to sanction parties for misconduct (see 37 C.F.R. 42.12), until the Board’s decision in SAP America et al. V. Lakshmi

Internet advertising patent saga continues: Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider decision in Ultramercial v. Hulu

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

In a brief, one paragraph order issued on May 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted that a recent decision covering patent-eligibility for medical testing methods is also relevant to Internet-based methods