We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 123

Maker of wireless location software sues Google for patent infringement, contract interference

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2010

Skyhook Wireless, a manufacturer of location software for wireless smart phones, filed a pair of lawsuits against Google on Wednesday that accuse the web search giant of patent infringement and of interference in a contract arrangement between Skyhook and Motorola that induced Motorola to ship Android cell phones without Skyhook's location software

Motorola accuses Apple of patent infringement

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2010

Motorola joined the smart phone litigation fray with the filing of complaints with two U.S. district courts and with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that accuse Apple, Inc. of infringing 18 Motorola patents in the design of the iPhone, the iPad, the iPod Touch and certain Mac computer products

Business method as essential element of valid patent claim: Amazon one-click decision, a Canadian prosecution perspective

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 28 2011

On November 24, 2011, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal released a vital decision quashing the Commissioner of Patents’ stated “tradition” of excluding business methods from patentability

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

CAFC finds that adapting well-known methods of doing business to the Internet is obvious as a matter of law

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

Sovereign brought a patent infringement suit against Newegg for infringement of certain claims in three U.S. patents, all relating to electronic

Online newsgroup post is a printed publication

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 23 2014

In SUFFOLK Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc., Appeal No. 13-1392, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment of anticipation

Will the public suffer? Let’s stay!

  • Carpmaels & Ransford LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 17 2014

The recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc shows that the UK courts are

$368 million damages award vacated

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

In VIRNETX, Inc. V. Cisco SYSTEMS, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1489, the Federal Circuit vacated a damages award for use of an improper royalty base

Online transaction claim held unpatentable

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

In BUYSAFE, Inc. V. Google, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1575, the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of