We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 98

With "one click", business methods are patentable in Canada

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2010

In a decision of the Federal Court of Canada released on October 14, 2010, Amazon.com, Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada, the Court allowed an appeal from a ruling by the Commissioner of Patents ("Commissioner") that had originally denied a patent application by Amazon.com Inc. ("Amazon") for its pervasively successful one click online ordering technology

Amazon.com open for business (methods) in Canada

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2010

On October 14, 2010, the Federal Court released the much anticipated decision of Amazon.com v. The Commissioner of Patents, 2010 FC 1011, relating to the patentability of software and business method patents in Canada

IP snapshot

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 21 2012

The High Court has refused to grant a stay of proceedings for infringement of a Community Trade Mark under Article 104(1) of the CTM Regulation where there were parallel proceedings before OHIM

Soverain Software v. J.C. Penney: denying summary judgment of non-infringement of e-commerce patent based on divided infringement theory

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 16 2012

Plaintiff Soverain Software alleged infringement of patents relating to e-commerce transactions over the Internet involving the use of a shopping cart and online statements

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

Amazon 1-click decision: Canadian Federal Court unequivocally rejects ‘form and substance’ approach in determination of patentable subject-matter

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2010

In a strongly-worded and highly anticipated decision, the Federal Court has redefined patentable subject matter in Canada

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Rembrandt v. Facebook: district court excludes damage expert where expert failed to apportion damages to patented features in accused product

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2013

Rembrandt Social Media, LP ("Rembrandt") filed a patent infringement action against Facebook alleging that Facebook infringed two of its patents

Printed publication need not be easily searchable online if sufficiently disseminated

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 29 2014

Fed. Cir. Affirms claim construction and summary judgment that an online posting was an invalidating "printed publication." Suffolk Tech. LLC v. AOL

Court grants stay pending IPR to non-petitioner, conditioned on agreement to estoppel

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2014

In a further development in an area where numerous district court judges have issued divergent opinions, a court in the Northern District of