We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 119

Avoiding PTAB sanctions just play by the rules

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Despite having the authority to sanction parties for misconduct (see 37 C.F.R. 42.12), until the Board’s decision in SAP America et al. V. Lakshmi

Motion to dismiss denied where claim for joint infringement was not at issue in complaint

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2012

Plaintiff Intertainer, Inc. brought an action for patent infringement against Defendant Hulu, LLC

Canadian Federal Court of Appeal renders decision in Amazon.com "1-Click" case

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 25 2011

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has rendered its decision in the Attorney General’s appeal from an earlier Federal Court decision in favour of Amazon.com and its “1-Click” patent application

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function

With "one click", business methods are patentable in Canada

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2010

In a decision of the Federal Court of Canada released on October 14, 2010, Amazon.com, Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada, the Court allowed an appeal from a ruling by the Commissioner of Patents ("Commissioner") that had originally denied a patent application by Amazon.com Inc. ("Amazon") for its pervasively successful one click online ordering technology

Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent

Amazon.com’s Canadian “one-click” patent on the threshold of issuance

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 6 2012

This past year was truly an important year for Canadian decisions on business method patents, both from the Court and the Commissioner of Patents, and these decisions are receiving rapid attention

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Emerging trends: competing policy issues at stake in the Supreme Court’s review of Akamai v. Limelight

  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2014

On April 30, the Supreme Court of the United States reviewed the Federal Circuit's decision in Akamai Technologies, Inc v. Limelight Networks, Inc

EDTX excludes opinions on non-comparable licenses

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2014

On May 9, 2014, Judge Davis of the Eastern District of Texas issued a Daubertopinion in Tracbeam, L.L.C. V. Google, Inc., Case No. 6:13-cv-00093-LED