We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 61

The submission of new evidence to the Court’s expert witness, voluntary patent limitation and the revocation of Interim Measures

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • December 10 2014

Some of the most debated issues in Italian patent litigation intersect in a recent order of the Enterprise Matters Section of the Court of Milan (Ord

Produzione di documenti in corso di CTU, limitazione volontaria del brevetto e revoca del provvedimento cautelare

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • December 9 2014

Una recentissima ordinanza della Sezione Specializzata in materia di Impresa del Tribunale di Milano (Ord. 2 dicembre 2014, R. G. 208962011, G. I

Is a mere distributor entitled to file a patent infringement lawsuit? The Italian Supreme Court says yes

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • October 21 2014

Even the mere distributor of a patented product is entitled to file a lawsuit for infringement of the relevant patent in a competent court: so it was

Il mero distributore può agire a tutela del brevetto? La Cassazione dice di sì

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • October 21 2014

Anche il mero distributore del prodotto brevettato ha legittimazione ad agire in giudizio per la contraffazione del brevetto: così ha deciso la

Defendant pokes holes in screen patent claims

  • Jacobacci & Partners
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • October 8 2014

In Effe v Stiltende Genius the Court of Milan denied injunctive relief under the doctrine of equivalents to a plaintiff which tried to base an

The Court of Milan in Sanofi v. Teva “repeats” the CJEU judgment in Actavis

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • European Union, Italy
  • -
  • September 18 2014

By judgment No. 985514 published on 1 August, the Business Chamber “A” of the Court of Milan has decided the lawsuit filed by Sanofi against Teva

Italy: new developments on the validity of SPCs for a combination of active ingredients

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • September 18 2014

In July 2014 the Court of Milan filed two judgments declaring the invalidity of the Italian supplementary protection certificate ("SPC") on the

Certificati protettivi complementari: il Tribunale di Milano in Sanofi v. Teva “replica” la sentenza della CGUE nel caso Actavis

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • September 17 2014

Con sentenza n. 985514 pubblicata lo scorso 1 agosto, la Sezione Specializzata in Materia di Impresa "A" del Tribunale di Milano ha deciso il

Italy: new developments in the “Pfizer saga” - a recent judgment provides further guidance on the interaction between antitrust law and patent law in the pharmaceutical sector

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • August 11 2014

The Italian Supreme Administrative Court's recent judgment in the Pfizer case, which upheld a decision by the Italian Competition Authority (ICA

Interesse ad agire per accertamento negativo cautelare e periculum in mora: il Tribunale di Milano fa chiarezza

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Con ordinanza dello scorso 19 giugno il Tribunale di Milano, Sezione Specializzata in Materia di Impresa "A", ha analizzato la differenza tra