We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In the long awaited decision in Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court has concluded that the machine-or-transformation (“MOT”) test is not the sole arbiter of patentable subject matter for “processes” under section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act
On June 28th, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. Kappos that was hoped would clarify the law surrounding patent-eligible subject matter under section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act
