Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Patenting business methods after Mayo

Foley & Lardner LLP
-
USA
-
July 30 2012

Advances in information technology, such as high-performance computing, enables the collection, analysis and sharing of information between patients and medical providers

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms clear and convincing evidence standard for patent invalidity

Foley & Lardner LLP
-
USA
-
June 9 2011

In its decision in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, No. 10-290 (June 9, 2011), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Federal Circuit's long-established precedent that in all patent infringement cases, an accused infringer must prove patent invalidity by clear and convincing evidence

Supreme Court rejects Stanford's argument: will Bayh-Dole be amended?

Foley & Lardner LLP
-
USA
-
June 7 2011

The Supreme Court on June 6, 2011 rejected Stanford University's argument that it owned important patents

Court finds 25 percent "rule of thumb" to be a fundamentally flawed patent damages tool

Foley & Lardner LLP
-
USA
-
January 5 2011

In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. Cir. Jan. 4, 2011), the Federal Circuit addressed arguments relating to a number of damages issues

Search results

Patenting business methods after Mayo

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms clear and convincing evidence standard for patent invalidity

Supreme Court rejects Stanford's argument: will Bayh-Dole be amended?

Court finds 25 percent "rule of thumb" to be a fundamentally flawed patent damages tool

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Workarea