We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 320

Do the USPTO 101 guidelines violate international trade agreements?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2014

One advantage of being a blogger in the relatively small world of patents is that I have gotten to know practitioners in other countries who also

Federal Circuit refuses to find implied license for Endo Opana patents

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

In Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's decision denying Endo's motion for summary judgment

PTAB terminates IPR sua sponte where claims indefinite

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2014

As dictated by 35 U.S.C. 311, a petitioner can pursue inter partes review ("IPR") before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB" or "Board"

Supreme Court hears argument on software patents

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2014

The Supreme Court heard arguments this morning in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, which concerns the patent eligibility of

Delayed restriction requirement does not result in patent term adjustment for divisional application

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

In Mohsenzadeh v. Lee (decided March 19, 2014), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that the Patent Term Adjustment

New Scheduling Order may preview future Delaware “local patent rules”

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

On March 24, 2014, Judge Sue L. Robinson of the District of Delaware adopted a new model Scheduling Order for patent cases litigated in her court

District court doubts patent eligbility of Myriad BRCA claims

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2014

In a decision issued March 10, 2014, Judge Shelby of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah denied Myriad's motion for a preliminary

District Judge Payne holds that form 18’s “talismanic” pleading is superseded by IqbalTwombly

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2014

In a March 10, 2014 opinion in Macronix Int'l Co. v. Spansion Inc., District Judge Robert E. Payne held that the sufficiency of patent infringement

Pre-issuance conduct may support declaratory judgment jurisdiction

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2014

In this case, the parties (or their predecessors) had been litigating other patent disputes since as early as 2001. The instant dispute centered

Trade secret vs. patent protection: consider FOIA or public records requests

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2014

With patents coming under increasing scrutiny at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") in conjunction with changes to the patent laws brought