We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 413

Federal Circuit finds disclaimer based on “object of invention” language

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2015

The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc. (No. 2014-1396) provides patent litigators with a

Judge finds biosimilar patent procedures optional

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2015

Judge Seeborg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order inAmgen, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., ruling that the

Federal Circuit limits patent exhaustion doctrine for complementary technology

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2015

In its 2013 decision in Keurig, Inc. v. Sturm Foods, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that a purveyor of coffee cartridges did not infringe Keurig’s

The Remicade biosimilar patent dispute

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2015

While Sandoz has grabbed the biosimilar headlines for being the first company to have a product approved under the Biologics Price Competition and

Patent eligibility under Alice: reliance on lack of routine or conventional use

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 3 2015

Federal courts have continued to wrestle with the standard for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 set by the Supreme Court's ruling in

Federal Circuit upholds Patent Term Adjustment deduction for IDS filed after Restriction Requirement

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2015

In Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Lee, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO's interpretation of the Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) statute as permitting the

Court cites objects of invention in claim construction

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2015

Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc. is one of those Federal Circuit decisions that may send patent practitioners running to their

Federal Circuit affirms use of broadest reasonable interpretation of claims in IPR proceedings

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2015

In affirming the decision of the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit upheld the

Federal Circuit upholds Patent Office's first decision of unpatentability in an inter partes review

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2015

Today in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, No. 14-1301, a majority (Judges Dyk and Clevenger) affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB

Why did the Supreme Court GVR the Shire Lialda case?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded Shire Development LLC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to the