We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 364

Are permanent injunctions in patent cases back in style?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 21 2014

Two recent district court decisions out of the District of Delaware have again placed the spotlight on permanent injunctions in patent cases. Prior

Federal Circuit upholds inequitable conduct defense against Apotex patent

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

In Apotex Inc. v. UCB, Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court's finding that Apotex's patent is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct

NPEs continue to play large role in patent litigation

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 17 2014

The annual patent litigation study recently released by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) sets forth some interesting trends in patent litigation

First post grant review petition shows that amending claims is not child's play

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2014

The first Post Grant Review petition visible to the public was filed August 5, 2014, against U.S. Patent 8,684,420. The patent was granted from an

Federal Circuit finds that FDA citizen petition could give rise to antitrust liability

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

In Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., the Federal Circuit remanded-in-part for the district court to determine whether

The USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidance trips over treaty requirements

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The "Myriad-Mayo" patent subject matter eligibility guidance issued March 4, 2014 reflects the USPTO's interpretation of Supreme Court cases

Comments on patent subject matter eligibility guidance due by July 31

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

This week brings the July 31, 2014 deadline for submitting written comments on two USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidance documents: The

Federal Circuit says Commission must toe the line in Invisalign ITC case

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

In Align Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit held that ITC action that violated ITC's own regulations warranted

New guidance from the Federal Circuit on motions to stay litigation pending a PTAB proceeding

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

In VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., No. 2014-1232 (July 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit issued its first opinion directed to the issue of

More changes in Delaware: Judge Stark revises patent case procedures

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware recently issued revised procedures for managing patent cases that are assigned to him. These