We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 393

Court denies summary judgment motion as premature prior to Markman hearing

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

Pipeline Technologies Inc. ("Pipeline") filed a patent infringement action against Telog Instruments Inc. ("Telog"). Telog filed a motion for summary

UGG: default judgment and treble damages entered against defendant where defendant failed to participate in discovery

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2014

Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation ("Plaintiff") alleged that Defendants Superstar International, Inc. and Sai Liu ("Defendants") produce

District court grants motion to reconsider summary judgment motion after Supreme Court's decision in Limelight v. Akamai

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2014

In this patent infringement action, FedEx moved for reconsideration after the district court had denied its motion for summary judgment regarding the

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied where plaintiff had prevailed in previous inter partes review

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff, CTP Innovations, LLC ("CTP") sued V.G. Reed and Sons, Inc. ("Reed") to stop Reed's alleged infringement

Court excludes plaintiff's experts where experts failed to comply with Rule 26 disclosures

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2014

In this patent infringement action, the defendants, Hangzhou Langhong Technology Co., Ltd. and Langhong Technology USA Inc., moved to exclude the

District court denies preliminary injunction where plaintiffs could not show irreparable harm because defendant is large and well established company

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2014

Plaintiff Hill-Rom Company, Inc. ("Hill-Rom") filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against General Electric Company ("GE"). The district court

Motion to set aside default where defendant waited too long to obtain new counsel

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2014

Plaintiff Fleet Engineers, Inc. ("Fleet") develops, manufactures, and sells after-market products for the trucking industry. Defendant Tarun Surti

Court denies monetary sanctions based on overdesignation of documents as Confindential-Outside Counsel Eyes Only but orders defendants to re-designate documents and pay cost for redesignating documents in the plaintiff's document management system

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

In this patent infringement action brought by plaintiff Trustees of Boston University ("BU") , BU alleged that defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5

Supreme Court's decision on indefiniteness constitutes basis to reconsider prior claim construction order but does not result in change of the claim construction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

In this patent infringement action, Defendant Lighthouse Photonics Corporation's ("Lighthouse") moved to reconsider the Court's Claim Construction

Motion to stay pending CBM review granted where non-practicing entity did not seek preliminary injunction

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Boku, Inc. ("Boku") filed a CBM petition with the PTAB seeking review of the patentability of Plaintiff's U.S. Patent No. 7,273,168 (the "'168