Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-8 of 8
Market abuseinsider dealingFSA enforcement
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 10 2012
The Wheatley Review of LIBOR, which was commissioned by HM Treasury to review the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, has issued its final report
Shah v HSBC: High Court clarifies bank's duties to customers when making SARs
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- May 22 2012
The High Court has clarified the extent to which banks are required to disclose information to their customers about whom they have made money laundering disclosures or have obligations to such customers which could expose them to liability in the event that the banks' money laundering disclosures causes loss to those customers
Court of Appeal rules that identity of employees making money laundering reports can be redacted when disclosing documents in Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited 2011 EWCA Civ 1154
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 17 2011
The case concerns an interim application regarding the disclosure of documents by HSBC, in the context of proceedings brought by Mr Shah and his wife against HSBC seeking damages for breaches of duty and failure to follow his instructions to process transactions whilst the bank’s requests for consent under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) were pending with the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA
Shah v HSBC
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 15 2011
The Court of Appeal in the latest instalment of this long running dispute found that the identity of employees making money laundering reports can be redacted when disclosing documents in litigation
Shah v HSBC: Court of Appeal rules that identity of employees making money laundering reports can be redacted when disclosing documents in litigation
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 24 2011
This ruling is the latest development in the ongoing Shah v HSBC saga, proceedings brought by Mr Shah and his wife, two Zimbabwean-based customers of HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited ("HSBC"), for losses allegedly caused as a result of delays whilst HSBC's requests for consent under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("POCA") were pending with the Serious Organised Crime Agency ("SOCA"
Shah and anor v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited 2010 EWCA Civ 31
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- February 16 2010
In December 2009, Hamblen J gave a summary judgment in the case of Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited against Mr Shah (and his wife
Shah v HSBC: Court of Appeal says fact of suspicions of money laundering can be tested at trial
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- February 12 2010
Last year, HSBC was successful in obtaining summary judgment on a claim brought by one of its customers, Mr Shah (and his wife
Shah v HSBC: what duties do banks owe their customers when making SARs?
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- April 24 2009
Earlier this year, the High Court considered a claim by a customer against his bank in relation to its failure to process transactions whilst requests for consent under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) were pending with the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA
Current Search
- Workarea - Litigation
- Workarea - Banking
- Jurisdiction - United Kingdom
- Author - Susannah Cogman
Suggested Facets
Author
- Daniel Hudson (5)
- Elizabeth Head (2)
- Graham More (6)
- Nichola Peters (7)
- Peter Burrell (3)
- Sehar Ali-Noor (1)
- Stephen Flaherty (2)