We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,052

A bank or not a bank? MoneyGram fails to meet the test in U.S. Tax Court

  • Roetzel & Andress
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

MoneyGram International Inc., (MoneyGram) the world's second-largest money transfer company, lost its bid before the U.S. Tax Court (the Court) to

Supreme Court clarifies borrower’s rescission rights under the Truth in Lending Act

  • Frost Brown Todd LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2015

On January 13, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided that a borrower may simply provide written notice to a lender to exercise its right

Interchange fee battle comes to an end

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2015

The United States Supreme Court has denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in NACS, fka National Association of Convenience Stores, et al., v

Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank and Hana Financial Group

  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2015

In the latest of the Supreme Court's intellectual property law decisions, the Court today unanimously held that the question of whether two marks are

State AGs take sides as U.S. Supreme Court hears housing discrimination case

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

On January 21, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, on

Eighth Circuit rips district court for failing to rigorously analyze class requirements

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

On January 13, 2014, the Eighth Circuit overturned, on interlocutory appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f), a district court's order certifying

Jesinoski presents lenders with difficult questions on loan rescissions

  • Thompson Hine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

On January 13, 2015, in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Case No. 13684, 574 U. S. ____ (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held that if a

U.S. Supreme Court holds TILA does not require borrower to file suit to rescind transaction

  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

The United States Supreme Court recently held in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., 574 U.S. (2015), that the Truth in Lending

High Court rules that borrowers may exercise right to rescind mortgage loans by providing notice to lender of intent to rescind within three years of loan closing

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

On Jan. 13, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. 13-684, 2015 WL

Is a communication between a debt collector and a credit reporting agency a communication “in connection with the collection of any debt” for purposes of the FDCPA?

  • Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2015

In a case in which the Eighth Circuit actually found against a debtor on her claim against a collection agency based on the FDCPA, the court