We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
It is not uncommon, particularly in a finance context, for an agreement to give a wider choice to some parties than others to decide where disputes will be resolved
The Court of Appeal has reiterated the distinction between the broad discovery regime that applied before the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) in 1999 and the more limited requirements under CPR “standard disclosure”
In Barclays Bank plc v Guardian News and Media Limited 2009 EWHC 591 the High Court considered whether or not to continue an interim injunction which had been granted when confidential documents belonging to a bank had been leaked and passed to a national newspaper
