We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Where a company lent money to a prominent businessman and politician and secured the loan by a guarantee given by the borrower's business associates, held that the guarantors were liable under the guarantee even though the lender knew of, but failed to disclose to them, circumstances that rendered the loan monies liable to seizure by government authorities
