We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In a German case before the European Court of Justice, Advocate General (AG) Mazak has offered a helpful opinion clarifying what constitutes a services concession for the purposes of the procurement rules (NB. AG opinions are not binding but are often followed in subsequent judgments, which normally follow a few months later
In a judgment of the European Court related to a Greek case (Club Hotel Loutraki), the Court held that in the context of the privatisation of a previously state owned business, an incidental public works obligation was insufficiently central to that contract to bring it within the scope of the public procurement rules
