We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

European Court of Justice decides winemaker cannot label product as “wholesome”

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • September 14 2012

A European Court of Justice panel has determined that a German winemaker may not, under European Union law, place labels on its bottles including the word bekömmlich (meaning digestible, wholesome or nourishing

EU Court of Justice finds certain Dutch eco-contracting requirements unlawful

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • -
  • May 11 2012

The Court of Justice of the European Union has agreed, in part, with the European Commission’s challenge to requirements imposed by the Dutch government on contractors providing organic and fair trade products in its automatic coffee machines

European General Court annuls EC decision removing triclosan from food contact substance list

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • October 28 2011

The European General Court (ECG) has determined that the European Commission (EC) erred in removing the antibacterial chemical 2,4,4’-trcihloro- 2’-hydroxydiphenyl ether (triclosan) from the list of additives that may be used to make plastic materials and other articles that come into contact with foods

European Court of Justice weighs in on GMOs

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 22 2011

In recent weeks, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has issued rulings in two cases involving genetically modified organisms (GMOs

Court Advocate General calls French ban on GM crops an EU law violation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • March 25 2011

An advocate general to the European Court of Justice has reportedly issued an opinion stating that French authorities violated European Union (EU) law by suspending the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) maize on French soil without first asking the European Commission to adopt emergency measures

Preliminary EU ruling says honey with GMO is not authorized

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • February 18 2011

According to an advocate general opinion, which is not binding on the European Union (EU) Court of Justice, honey that contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs) due to the proximity of the hives to experimental GMO maize fields is considered a food produced from a GMO and therefore cannot be marketed unless authorized