We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Court prevents music company from pulling out songs from online music service

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • November 3 2011

In a summary judgment dated 5 September 2011, the Paris Court rejected Universal's request to order Deezer, an online music service, to remove all of Universal's songs from Deezer's free music catalogue

Annual digest 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's Olympic Stadium, the anti-doping movement has come under increased pressure this year

Gaming company files suit for unlawful competition against online gaming company

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Spain
  • -
  • May 4 2011

A Spanish listed gaming company which operates traditional bingo halls, betting shops and casinos in various countries has initiated a legal action on the basis of unlawful and unfair competition to force a Gibraltar-based online gaming company to drop its sponsorship of a Spanish football club and cease advertising in Spain

Regulatory & public law group annual digest 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's

District court approves Department of Justice’s settlement agreements with Hachette, HarperCollins, and Simon & Schuster

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2012

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York has approved the Department of Justice’s settlement agreements with three of the five publishers that the DOJ alleged in its April 11, 2012 complaint conspired with Apple, Inc. to raise the price of electronic books