We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 196

EU political update 29 Apr - 3 May 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 29 2013

On 25 April, the Commission invited comments from interested parties on commitments offered by Google in relation to online search and search

General Court annuls partially the Commission’s CISAC decision on concerted practice

  • Roschier
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 17 2013

The General Court (the "GC") handed down 22 judgments in actions brought by the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers

Full court reduces penalty against TPG from $2 million to $50,000

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 9 2013

Jacobson, Bennett and Gilmour JJ of the Federal Court handed down their judgment on relief in relation to TPG Internet Pty Ltd’s (TPG) appeal against

Chinese consumer wins abuse of dominance civil action against tie-in sales in program bundling

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • April 6 2013

On January 5th, 2013, the Xi'an Intermediate People's Court (the "Court") ruled in favor of a consumer who sued Shanxi Broadcast & TV Network

Common and predominating damages: Comcast opinion extends Wal-Mart v. Dukes' standards for class certification but leaves the question of Daubert for another day

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

On March 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, Case No. 11-864, which provides a valuable tool for the defense in

In Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, the Supreme Court makes clear that Rule 23’s “rigorous analysis” applies to damages issues

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

For the second time in two weeks, the Supreme Court delivered a win to class-action defendants. Two weeks ago, in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v

Comcast Corp. v. Behrend: Supreme Court rejects expert damages model as insufficient for class certification in antitrust class action

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 opinion in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. ___ (2013), that a party seeking to maintain a class

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

Supreme Court requires proof at certification stage that damages can be measured on class-wide basis

  • Ballard Spahr LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court decided earlier this week that putative class plaintiffs could not bring a class action antitrust lawsuit unless

Comcast Corp. v. Behrend: Supreme Court reinforces Dukes -- holds that class certification requires merits assessment of damages claims

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Yesterday, in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. __ (2013), the Supreme Court strongly reinforced its earlier decision in Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v