We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

Preview 2013 (UK law)

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 15 2013

2013 will herald some significant changes to the UK legal arena, notably in the corporate area in relation to executive remuneration and narrative

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

BLG Monthly Update

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • December 19 2012

The BLG Monthly Update is a digest of recent developments in the law which Neil Guthrie, our National Director of Research, thinks you will find

Sports agent non-compete and trade secrets dispute heats up in California

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 19 2012

With the NBA basketball season almost upon us, a high profile legal battle between an aspiring NBA sports agent and his former agency continues to heat up in Los Angeles federal court

Federal courts address question of employer-employee ownership of business-related social media accounts

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2012

The question of whether an employer is entitled to trade secret protection over social media accounts used for business purposes is unfolding in several well-publicized cases currently pending in federal courts throughout the country

Emotions are no substitute for facts

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2012

It’s no secret that restrictive covenant and trade secrets claims are sometimes used as leverage in business disputes

Is describing a C-level executive’s discharge as “for cause” defamatory?

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2011

I saw your last question about discharging an executive for cause

The inevitable disclosure doctrine rejected in Québec

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 26 2009

The American doctrine of inevitable disclosure is based on the idea that, in some circumstances, an individual’s knowledge of a company’s trade secrets may be so significant that if he or she were to leave an employer to work in a similar job elsewhere, the move would inevitably lead to disclosure of the former employer’s trade secrets in the course of performing the new tasks