We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Hollywood v ISP - iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 7 2010

On 4 February 2010, the Australian Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies

Hollywood v ISP iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement by Australian Federal Court

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 24 2010

On 4 February 2010 the Australian Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third-largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies

Hollywood v ISP - appeal lodged against iiNet win

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 26 2010

Earlier this month we reported that the Federal Court had dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third-largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies

Hollywood v ISP iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 4 2010

Today the Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies