Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Hollywood v ISP - iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement
- Norton Rose LLP
- -
- Australia
- -
- June 7 2010
On 4 February 2010, the Australian Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies
Hollywood v ISP iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement by Australian Federal Court
- Norton Rose LLP
- -
- Australia
- -
- March 24 2010
On 4 February 2010 the Australian Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third-largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies
Hollywood v ISP - appeal lodged against iiNet win
- Norton Rose LLP
- -
- Australia
- -
- February 26 2010
Earlier this month we reported that the Federal Court had dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third-largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies
Hollywood v ISP iiNet held not responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement
- Norton Rose LLP
- -
- Australia
- -
- February 4 2010
Today the Federal Court dismissed a claim by a multi-national alliance of motion picture and recording industry companies, represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), that iiNet, Australia's third largest internet service provider, had authorised copyright infringement by failing to stop its customers from using the otherwise legitimate BitTorrent file sharing software system to download copyrighted movies
