We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 52

Search engine ordered to remove defamatory content from search auto-complete function

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • June 1 2011

On 24 March 2011, the Civil Court of Milan confirmed its preliminary injunction issued on 25 January 2011 against Google, Inc

ISP ordered to remove offensive messages from social networking site

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Brazil
  • -
  • November 3 2011

The Brazilian Supreme Court of Justice (Supreme Court) confirmed a decision requiring an internet service provider (ISP) to remove offensive content from posts on a social networking service

Digital media update

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 25 2012

Welcome to the January edition of our quarterly Digital Media Update

High Court rules on keyword advertising

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 8 2013

In May 2012, we reported that the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia had found Google had engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct when

2011 in review and 2012 challenges

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2012

In this update, we identify top labor and employment developments in the U.S. and offer proactive tips to help employers plan for compliance challenges in 2012

Supreme Court of Canada to rule on whether ISPs can be regulated under the Broadcasting Act

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 28 2011

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has granted leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal judgment dated 7 July 2010, which held that internet service providers (ISPs) do not carry on a "broadcasting undertaking" as defined in the federal Broadcasting Act

Newsflash

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 27 2012

On 3 March 2011 the Crown Court upheld the conviction of Paul Chambers for sending by a public electronic communications network a message of a "menacing character" contrary to s.127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003

Telecommunications operator obtains favourable decision in dispute against copyright collecting society for simulcasting

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Brazil
  • -
  • May 3 2012

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice determined that a telecommunications operator (Oi) is not liable for royalties for the public performance of musical works played simultaneously on the radio and over the internet

High Court finds Google not liable for misleading or engaging in deceptive conduct for displaying sponsored links

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 3 2013

On 6 February 2013, Australia's High Court reversed the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia which found that Google engaged

Telecommunications firms litigate internet speed advertising claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 30 2009

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has denied a request for an injunction by Bell Canada, the largest Canadian internet service provider, but has made important comments on the merits of an underlying action relating to comparative advertising of internet speed claims

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy