We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Conditional access - “illicit device” and Euro defences

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 10 2008

Karen Murphy, you will recall, is the pub landlady from Southsea, England who liked to entertain customers with live Premier League matches courtesy of the Greek satellite system, Nova

No likelihood of confusion among co-owner users of mark

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2008

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the plaintiff’s claim under the Lanham Act failed as a matter of law because the defendant (who was co-owner with plaintiff of the original Geisha Chicago sushi restaurant) was authorized to use the trademark for sushi restaurants opened later

How legal are the football broadcasts in pubs?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 31 2008

In the case of Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Limited 2007 EWHC 3091 (Admin), the English High Court upheld the finding of the Portsmouth Crown Court that the Appellant had committed an offence under Section 297(1) of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA

Circumventing conditional access, “illicit device” and copyright

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 30 2008

On 24 June 2008, in The Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure 2008 EWHC 1411, the FA Premier League (FAPL) suffered another potential setback in its campaign against pub landlords using foreign decoder cards in the United Kingdom to access foreign transmissions of live Premier League football matches, and the decoder suppliers

Foreign fame is not enough to justify trademark protection in New York

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2008

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to New York’s highest court regarding New York common law claims for unfair competition based on goodwill

Quick, tasty and possibly infringing pizza

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2009

Addressing the issue of trademark genericness and infringement, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated a district court’s summary judgment ruling that the term was generic and that there was no likelihood of confusion

Transfer of over 1500 domain names

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • March 31 2010

In Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels v Daniel Kirchhof D2009-1661 WIPO, a Uniform Domain- Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) panellist ordered the transfer of over 1500 domain names from an individual registrant, to Six Continents