Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 54
Apotex v. Canada (Minister of Health)
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- May 28 2009
Apotex brought a judicial review of the Minister’s refusal to issue a NOC regarding its version of aspirin
AstraZeneca v. Apotex; interlocutory motion for reply evidence; esomeprazole
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- February 12 2010
The Court dismissed AstraZeneca's appeal from the order of a prothonotary refusing to strike parts of Apotex' evidence and refusing to permit the applicants to file reply
Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Apotex
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- April 7 2009
The Court refused to grant prohibition on the basis that Apotex's allegation in respect of invalidity for obviousness was justified
Apotex v. Adir
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- July 27 2009
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Trial Division finding that the patent was both valid and infringed
Sanofi v. Hospira, merits of a 55.2 proceeding
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- December 3 2009
The Court refused to grant an Order of Prohibition against Hospira regarding its docetaxel product
Pfizer v. ratiopharm, motion to amended a previous judgment on the merits
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- December 3 2009
ratiopharm was successful in the proceeding under the NOC Regulations at the trial level, but the decision was overturned on appeal
Eli Lilly v. Hospira, interlocutory motion regarding further and better affidavit of documents
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- January 20 2010
In a case of patent infringement, the Case Management Prothonotary had ordered Hospira to produce a further and better Affidavit of Documents pursuant to an earlier motion by the Plaintiffs
Eli Lilly v. Apotex
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- May 4 2009
In the underlying decision on the merits, the Federal Court dismissed the application on the basis that the allegation as to a lack of sound prediction because the patent lacks adequate disclosure was justified
Apotex v. Pfizer
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 4 2009
The Court of Appeal dismissed the generic company's appeal and upheld the decision of the trial judge prohibiting Apotex entering the market until the expiry of the patent
Abbott v. Sandoz
- Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- April 7 2009
The Court of Appeal dismissed the innovator's appeal regarding a finding that the allegation of invalidity was justified
