We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 203

Was the property an apartment or a condominium?

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 27 2013

It mattered in Ment Bros Iron Works Co LLC v Interstate Fire & Casualty Co (2d Circuit, 11 December 2012). Ment Bros, a welding contractor, was

Duty to defend not triggered by allegations outside professional services coverage

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2008

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado, applying Colorado law, has held that allegations in several lawsuits brought against a real estate investment trust did not trigger the insurer's duty to defend the trust under miscellaneous professional liability policies that covered the provision of professional services

Diminution of property value may be covered loss under property policy, Georgia Supreme Court holds

  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2012

On May 29, 2012, answering a question certified to it by the Eleventh Circuit, the Georgia Supreme Court held that in addition to the costs of repair, a first-party property policy also may cover the diminution in property value

Chinese drywall first bellwether trial ongoing

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2010

The first federal trial in the nationwide Chinese drywall controversy began on February 19th, 2010 in New Orleans and is ongoing

In a New York State of mind... For expanded vandalism coverage

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 13 2013

Why it matters: Property owners in New York with coverage for vandalism will be pleased with the Georgitsi Realty LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance Company

JPMorgan Chase agrees to settle forced-placed insurance class-action lawsuit for $300 million

  • Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 6 2013

JPMorgan Chase and Assurant Inc. recentlyagreed to settle a class-action lawsuit initiated in June 2012 for $300 million brought by a class of 1.3

Court denied motion to strike CUIPA claim where insured alleged similar misconduct against another policyholder.

  • McCarter & English LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2011

In Union Street Furniture & Carpet, Inc. v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Co., 2010 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1848 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 15, 2010), the insured brought action against its insurer after the insurer declined coverage for a loss resulting from a leaking roof and water damage

Title insurance cases (080213)

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

Class Action: insurer's attempt to moot class plaintiff's claims failed where tender of settlement failed to include offer of judgment and amounts

Title insurance cases (021112)

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

Coverage: where insured contracted to purchase all land owned by seller in a particular county and seller had previously conveyed a disputed parcel such that the contract did not included the disputed parcel, insured did not have a claim under title insurance policy despite the fact that policy erroneously described the disputed parcel Knispel v. Transnation Title Ins. Co., Case No. 223870 (Cal. App. Oct. 30, 2012) (reversing judgment

Title insurance cases

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 23 2012

Agency Agreements: insurer’s claim against its agent pursuant to their agency agreement is a claim for indemnification, and the statute of limitations does not begin to run on the claim until the agent refuses to indemnify the insurer