We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 17

Cabell v. Personal Insurance Co

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 19 2011

The appellants appealed the dismissal of their application for a declaration that their property insurance policy covered their outdoor in-ground swimming pool

Wagner v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 24 2011

The insureds had a comprehensive homeowners policy with the Defendant insurer

Jomaa v. Jomaa

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds

Minox Equities Ltd. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 30 2010

The insured owned a housing complex, for which it purchased a broad-form, all-risk policy of insurance from Sovereign-General Insuance Co. between 1993 and 2003

Homeowner's insurance

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 27 2012

An application by a deceased individual's son for an order that the insurance policy covered the deceased's immediate family was dismissed where the court found that the Public Guardian and Trustee ("PGT") had taken control of the deceased's assets before her death and had all the deceased's rights, so she could not have passed such a right to the applicant through her estate

Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs

Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage

Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property

Darch Estate v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co.

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 25 2011

Mr. Darch suffered from mental illness and set fire to his parents' home; the insurance issue was whether the intentional act exclusion in the insurance policy applied such that the defendant insurer was not required to compensate the plaintiffs for the losses

Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd

  • Harper Grey LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause