We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 26

And on the same topic broker contingent cargo liability insurance coverage

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Freight broker CDN Logistics purchased a policy from insurer Crum & Forster that included contingent cargo liability (CCL) and motor truck cargo (MTC

Cargo loaders can’t escape liability or exposure to high damages on summary judgment

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Shipper Cellu Tissue hired the Boldt Company to load and stow in a trailer a used “wrapper,” which is a heavy and sensitive piece of equipment that

Illinois’ conversion from contributory to comparative fault in joint tortfeasor analysis nixes active-passive negligence analysis in stolen container issue

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Shipper Eddie Bauer Fulfillment Services booked a load of blue jeans with broker LCG Logistics, which in turn placed the freight with carrier

A durable power of attorney probably isn’t sufficient to empower a broker to sue under Carmack

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Shipper Macias engaged broker Pyramid Transportation to arrange transit of a dump truck from Georgia to Texas. Pyramid booked the load with carrier

A motor carrier’s use of an owner-operator doesn’t morph it into a broker for insurance purposes (or otherwise)

  • Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Insurer Great West issued a policy to motor carrier COBRA Trucking which specifically excluded coverage for brokerage operations. COBRA had a contract

Texas Court of Appeals concludes that insurer has duty to defend railroad in suits arising from collision at railway crossing

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2012

In Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, No. 08-06-00022-CV, 2012 WL 3728176 (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2012), the Texas Court of Appeals concluded that a contractor’s liability policy required the insurer to defend the railroad in suits arising from a fatal collision at a railroad crossing

No waiver: Court of Appeal confirms insurers well protected by RORS

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2012

In Argo Systems FZE v Liberty Insurance PTE and Another (The “Copa Casino”) 2011 EWCA Civ 1572, the Court of Appeal considered whether a failure to raise a breach of warranty defence in a letter declining cover, in relation to a loss under a marine insurance policy, amounted to a waiver of the right to rely on that defence

Federal Court orders insurance premium discounts for automobile passive anti-theft devices

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2012

In a recent decision involving major auto carriers, the federal court in Philadelphia has issued an important decision regarding passive anti-theft device discounts

Court finds "you" ambiguous

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2012

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company issued insurance policies to Schilli Transportation Services and several related, but separate, corporations

Tug and barge are both covered vessels under policy

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2012

Egan Marine Corporation operates vessels on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal