Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Sixth Circuit finds coverage for losses resulting from retailer's data breach
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 5 2012
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that losses resulting from the theft of customers’ banking information from a retailer’s computer system are covered under a commercial crime policy’s computer fraud endorsement
Sixth Circuit finds coverage for losses resulting from retailer’s data breach
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 4 2012
On August 23, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Retailer Ventures, Inc. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. that losses resulting from the theft of customers’ banking information from a retailer’s computer system are covered under a commercial crime policy’s computer fraud endorsement
Minnesota AG sues debt collection agency for health privacy violations
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 24 2012
On January 19, 2012, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson announced a lawsuit against Accretive Health, Inc., for violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and its implementing regulations, the Minnesota Health Records Act, Minnesota’s debt collection statutes and Minnesota’s consumer protection laws
Minnesota federal court finds no coverage under technology errors and omissions policy because claims did not arise out of a “wrongful act” as defined in the policy
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 10 2007
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota denied a policyholder’s motion for summary judgment and granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that an electronic and information technology errors and omissions policy afforded coverage to defend a policyholder only against claims arising out of a “wrongful act” in the performance of or failure to perform electronic and information technology services, as defined by the policy, and not for a contract dispute that did not arise out of such a “wrongful act.”
