Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 6,809

To what extent are insurers required to cover premises where criminal activities are conducted?

Lavery de Billy LLP
-
Canada
-
May 24 2013

In a recent decision by the Court of Appeal of Québec, the Honourable Jacques Chamberland, J.C.A. reviewed the application of exclusion

Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims

Wiley Rein LLP
-
USA
-
May 23 2013

Applying Nevada law, a federal district court held that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify claims alleging damage from design defects in

Informal system of cleaning satisfactory a win for the defendant

McInnes Wilson Lawyers
-
Australia
-
May 22 2013

Judgment in the matter of Ryland v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited 2013 NSWCA 120 was handed down on 3 May 2013. The Plaintiff in this matter

Do liability policies, particularly pollution liability insurance policies, exclude coverage for all injunctions? The Fifth Circuit says no

Foley Hoag LLP
-
USA
-
May 22 2013

The Fifth Circuit handed down an important decision last week, Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, clarifying the scope of

ERISA litigation alert: check your plan subrogation and reimbursement language to eliminate “contractual gaps”

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
-
USA
-
May 21 2013

In U.S. Airways v. McCutchen, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ability of U.S. Airways' health plan to recover medical expenses that it previously

Beazley Underwriting Ltd. v. Al Ahleia Ins. Co., 2013 EWHC 677 (Comm)

Steptoe & Johnson LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
May 21 2013

The English High Court has considered a claims cooperation clause in a reinsurance contract and rejected the reinsurer’s argument that it barred the

AIU Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co., No. 07-7052, 2013 US Dist. LEXIS 41716 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2013)

Steptoe & Johnson LLP
-
USA
-
May 21 2013

In AIU Insurance Co. v. TIG Insurance Co., No. 07-7052, 2013 US Dist. LEXIS 41716 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2013), the US District Court for the Southern

Eighth Circuit addresses business risk exclusions

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
May 21 2013

In its recent decision in Spirtas Co. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10031 (8th Cir. May 20, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals

California district court: no coverage for complaints against insured law firm alleging improper withholding of fees

Wiley Rein LLP
-
USA
-
May 21 2013

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has granted an insurer's motion for summary

AstraZeneca Ins. Co. v. XL Ins. (Bermuda) Ltd., 2013 EWHC 349 (Comm)

Steptoe & Johnson LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
May 21 2013

In a helpful decision for reinsurers, the English High Court has decided that, under a Bermuda form policy, coverage was granted for settlements and

next >

Search results

To what extent are insurers required to cover premises where criminal activities are conducted?

Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims

Informal system of cleaning satisfactory a win for the defendant

Do liability policies, particularly pollution liability insurance policies, exclude coverage for all injunctions? The Fifth Circuit says no

ERISA litigation alert: check your plan subrogation and reimbursement language to eliminate “contractual gaps”

Beazley Underwriting Ltd. v. Al Ahleia Ins. Co., 2013 EWHC 677 (Comm)

AIU Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co., No. 07-7052, 2013 US Dist. LEXIS 41716 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2013)

Eighth Circuit addresses business risk exclusions

California district court: no coverage for complaints against insured law firm alleging improper withholding of fees

AstraZeneca Ins. Co. v. XL Ins. (Bermuda) Ltd., 2013 EWHC 349 (Comm)

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea