We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 834

New York appeals court: Dishonest Acts exclusion does not preclude coverage for SEC-ordered payment

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

Last week, the Appellate Division (First Department) of the New York State Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in the matter of JP Morgan

Massachusetts Appeals Court orders that 93A claim against carrier be severed, reverses trial court

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2014

In Santacroce v. Sametz, a plaintiff brought suit against both the alleged tortfeasor for negligence, and the tortfeasor's insurer for bad faith in

Massachusetts high court rules that insurer’s full reimbursement of insured’s expenses does not bar insured’s G.L. c. 93A claim

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2014

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently considered whether an insured could pursue a claim against an insurer which had breached its

District of Massachusetts finds coverage under a professional liability policy in underlying case centered on unfair competition

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2014

On October 28, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied an insurer's motion for summary judgment in a coverage

Massachusetts federal court rules that insurer’s decision to commence rescission action does not waive attorney-client privilege

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

Insurers can take comfort that their decision to bring a rescission action against a Massachusetts insured will not itself effect a waiver of the

Massachusetts federal court declares insured’s construction of general liability policy “irrational”

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

The federal district court in Massachusetts recently declared that a general liability policyholder's construction of a policy exclusion was

Massachusetts federal court rules limits equitable contribution between insurers

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

Recently, a Massachusetts federal court issued an opinion limiting the ability of one insurer to seek reimbursement from another insurer under the

Massachusetts Appeals Court declares that failure to follow contract conditions is not an “occurrence” under landscaper’s general liability insurance policy

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

On July 24, 2014, the Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion arising out of a subcontractor's clear-cutting of environmentally-sensitive

Connecticut Supreme Court: insurer has standing to seek declaratory judgment against fellow insurer of a common insured

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 14 2014

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently held that an insurer has standing to pursue a declaratory judgment action against another insurer of a common

New York Federal Court holds that insurance law section 3420(d)(2) does not apply to reservation of rights letter

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

A New York federal court recently held that the timeliness requirement of Section 3420(d)(2) of the New York Insurance Law does not apply to an