We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 64

Professional indemnity cover

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 23 2011

The first defendant solicitor had not been acting as a solicitor in private legal practice when conducting his administration of the estates of a deceased couple as a personal representative

Standard Life Assurance Ltd v ACE European Group financial mis-selling claims

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 2 2012

The claimant, Standard Life, claimed under its professional indemnity insurance for about £100 million spent to mitigate the risk of anticipated claims arising from the mis-selling of its Standard Life Pension Sterling Fund (the Fund

Goldsmith Williams v Travelers Insurance Company Ltd - condoning dishonesty

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 28 2010

The dishonesty exclusion in a professional indemnity policy applied where a director of the solicitors’ firm Joshua & Usman Legal Services Limited (JULS), Ms Usman, had condoned a state of affairs which allowed her fellow director, Mr Atikpakpa, to perpetrate two mortgage frauds in which the firm had acted for the lenders

Where are we with Jackson?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2013

April 2013 sees the biggest shake-up of the civil litigation costs and funding regime since 2000. That was when success fees and premiums became

Setting aside default judgments

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2010

In general, the action or inaction of a party's legal representatives must be treated under the CPR as the action or inaction of the party himself

Non-disclosure and misrepresentation

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 17 2010

The court allowed the insured's claim for an indemnity on the basis that, although there had been material non-disclosure or misrepresentation, the insurers could not show that the underwriters who wrote the risk were induced to do so by the facts misrepresented

Concurrent liability

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 23 2011

A builder, by virtue of his contract to build a building, does not assume any liability in tort in relation to defects in the building giving rise to pure economic loss

Jurisdiction

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • Malaysia, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 15 2011

The fact that a marine insurance policy was governed by English law did not make England the appropriate forum for a dispute between Malaysian shipowners and Malaysian insurers (Mujur Bakat SDN BHD v Uni Asia General Insurance Berhad www

Brokers’ duties

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 24 2011

When the claimant companies (Environcom) made a claim under their insurance policy in respect of a fire at their electrical goods waste recycling premises, insurers avoided the policy for non-disclosure relating to the use of plasma cutters in the “de-manufacturing” of fridges and previous fires

Legal expenses insurance

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 21 2011

For the second time this year, the High Court has considered the limits on an insurer’s right to control the insured’s choice of lawyer under a before the event (BTE) legal expenses insurance policy