Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 144

Quebec Court of Appeal clarifies the burden to be met by an insurer seeking to nullify a policy for misrepresentation by the client

Norton Rose Canada LLP
-
Canada
-
March 31 2013

On March 15, 2013, the Quebec Court of Appeal reversed a judgment of the Superior Court which had granted an insured's motion to institute

The Quebec Court of Appeal and the exclusions for criminal and intentional acts

Norton Rose Canada LLP
-
Canada
-
March 5 2013

On January 16, 2013, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld an exclusion for criminal and intentional acts invoked by an insurer in relation to fire

No scope for judicial review of FOS decision

Norton Rose Australia
-
Australia
-
January 15 2013

The proceeding concerned a challenge by Mickovski to a decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited (FOS) that it lacked jurisdiction to deal

Limitation of joinder of insurers

Norton Rose Australia
-
Australia
-
January 15 2013

The October 2012 decision by the NSW Supreme Court in Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Malouf 2012 NSWSC 1119 declined to grant leave to join an

Bridgecorp appeal

Norton Rose Australia
-
Australia, New Zealand
-
January 9 2013

Introduction On 20 December 2012, the Court of Appeal of New Zealand overturned the decision of the New Zealand High Court of Steigrad v BFSL, ruling

Excess of loss reinsurance - the importance of exclusive jurisdiction clauses

Norton Rose Australia
-
United Kingdom
-
January 9 2013

The recent English Court of Appeal decision of Amlin Corporate Member Ltd & Ors v Oriental Assurance Corporation 2012 EWCA Civ 1341 (Amlin v

An insurer’s duty to defendclarity from the Ontario Court of Appeal

Norton Rose Canada LLP
-
Canada
-
November 30 2012

In Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex1, the Ontario Court of Appeal provides helpful guidance concerning an insurer’s duty to defend

UK Supreme Court rules in favour of New Cap liquidators

Norton Rose Australia
-
Australia, United Kingdom
-
November 1 2012

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has, in a judgment handed down on 24 October 2012, ruled that the liquidators of New Cap are entitled to enforce in England against a Lloyd’s Syndicate a judgment of the New South Wales Supreme Court ordering the Syndicate to repay US$5,980,600, plus interest, which the Syndicate had received from New Cap in January 1999