We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 122

New York appeals court: Dishonest Acts exclusion does not preclude coverage for SEC-ordered payment

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

Last week, the Appellate Division (First Department) of the New York State Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in the matter of JP Morgan

Massachusetts federal court rules that insurer’s decision to commence rescission action does not waive attorney-client privilege

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

Insurers can take comfort that their decision to bring a rescission action against a Massachusetts insured will not itself effect a waiver of the

Massachusetts federal court declares insured’s construction of general liability policy “irrational”

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

The federal district court in Massachusetts recently declared that a general liability policyholder's construction of a policy exclusion was

Massachusetts Appeals Court declares that failure to follow contract conditions is not an “occurrence” under landscaper’s general liability insurance policy

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

On July 24, 2014, the Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion arising out of a subcontractor's clear-cutting of environmentally-sensitive

New York Federal Court holds that insurance law section 3420(d)(2) does not apply to reservation of rights letter

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

A New York federal court recently held that the timeliness requirement of Section 3420(d)(2) of the New York Insurance Law does not apply to an

Massachusetts federal court declares that professional liability insurer need not defend accounting firm for faulty investment advice

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2014

The federal district court in Massachusetts has declared that a professional liability insurer owes no duty to defend its insured, an accounting firm

First Circuit holds that preclusive effect of prior arbitration outcome is itself an arbitrable issue

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit earlier this year held that the preclusive effect of a prior arbitration is itself a matter for

Massachusetts Appeals Court finds that policyholder’s misrepresentations limit coverage

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2014

The Massachusetts Appeals Court has upheld a lower-court judgment severely limiting the amount of coverage available to a motor vehicle policyholder

Fourth Circuit declares “direct contributing properties” unambiguous in context of CBI coverage

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2014

In a 2-1 decision released on February 20, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court below and declared that the

Validus wins round one: retrocessions not taxable under 26 USC 4371(3)

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2014

A federal district court in Washington handed Validus Reinsurance a major win on Wednesday, declaring that the IRS has no authority to assess excise