We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Unknown purchaser liable for TUPE related dismissal

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 10 2012

Regulation 7 of TUPE states that a dismissal will be automatically unfair if the main reason for dismissal is the transfer itself, or a reason connected with the transfer that is not an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce (‘ETO reason’

Liability of administrators for acts of discrimination

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2011

In another case involving administrators, an employment tribunal somewhat controversially has held that the individual administrators could be liable as principals in an agency relationship with employees of a company in administration

Administrations and TUPE: Oakland -v- Wellswood revisited

  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2011

Where a company goes into administration and the administrators sell on part or all of the business the question arises whether accrued employee liabilities will pass over to the buyer, who may inherit an unexpected list of old debts