We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Fifth Circuit expected to issue landmark ruling concerning recognition of foreign bankruptcy proceedings contrary to US public policy

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 20 2012

In a widely followed dispute, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will soon render a decision on the appeal of a Texas Bankruptcy Court’s refusal to recognize non-debtor third party releases in the Mexican reorganization proceeding (concurso mercantil) of Mexican glass manufacturer Vitro SAB de CV

Court of Appeal reaffirms MERS' ability to foreclose, holds that recorded documents do not overcome a specifically pled violation of Section 2923.5

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2012

In Skov v. U.S. Bank N.A., 2102 WL 2549811 (June 8, 2012), the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision to sustain a demurrer against plaintiff Andrea Skov’s second amended complaint, holding that she had stated a claim for violation of Civil Code Section 2923.5, which requires a lender to contact a defaulted borrower to discuss alternatives to foreclosure before starting a nonjudicial foreclosure by recording a notice of default

Reinstatement of debt: a bankruptcy court's strict interpretation and application of change-in-control provisions to protect senior secured lenders

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2011

In In re Young Broadcasting, Inc., et al., 430 B.R. 99 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), a bankruptcy court strictly construed the change-in-control provisions of a pre-petition credit agreement and refused to confirm an unsecured creditors' committee's plan of reorganization, which had been premised on the reinstatement of the debtors' accelerated secured debt under Section 1124(2) of the Bankruptcy Code

Court to lenders: strict compliance with local recording requirements necessary

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2011

A decision out of the District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (the "District Court"), now being appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, highlights just how critical it is for lenders to strictly comply with local recording requirements when recording their liens