We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Decision in DBSI Inc., holds that the "particularity" requirement of F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b) was satisfied, notwithstanding the number of alleged fraudulent transfers

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2011

In a 10 page decision signed May 5, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to dismiss and held that the plaintiff Litigation Trustee satisfied the "particularity" requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b), despite having his complaint allege that each transfer within a 13 page list of transfers was fraudulent

The intersection between criminal law and bankruptcy law: can filing for bankruptcy affect a criminal defendant's sentence?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2013

Criminal defendants facing onerous restitution obligations as part of their sentence might contemplate a bankruptcy filing, in the hope of staving

Investment adviser Ivy Asset Management settles Madoff lawsuits for $210 million - installment 86

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 17 2012

On November 13, 2012, the U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) issued a press release entitled “US Labor Department Recovers Nearly $220 Million for Madoff Victims.”

The impending bankruptcy court hearing where Picard seeks to allow Hadassah to keep $32 million in fictitious profits - installment 47

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2011

Several Installments in this blog series about the long-running, global Ponzi scheme of Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”), the most recent of which was Installment 46, have discussed the proposed settlement with Hadassah (the “Hadassah Settlement”) by Irving Picard, the Bankruptcy Trustee for the Madoff Estate (“Picard”) in contrast to his vigorous pursuit of the WilponKatz Family private charitable foundations

Can Picard pull off a squeeze play by using his $5.2 million lawsuit against JASA to place pressure on Saul Katz of the Mets?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2011

A continuing theme of this blog series on Madoff has been the perplexing and inconsistent manner, virtually to the point of arbitrariness and unfairness, with which Trustee Irving Picard has handled charities that invested with Madoff