We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

The impending bankruptcy court hearing where Picard seeks to allow Hadassah to keep $32 million in fictitious profits - installment 47

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2011

Several Installments in this blog series about the long-running, global Ponzi scheme of Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”), the most recent of which was Installment 46, have discussed the proposed settlement with Hadassah (the “Hadassah Settlement”) by Irving Picard, the Bankruptcy Trustee for the Madoff Estate (“Picard”) in contrast to his vigorous pursuit of the WilponKatz Family private charitable foundations

Can Picard pull off a squeeze play by using his $5.2 million lawsuit against JASA to place pressure on Saul Katz of the Mets?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2011

A continuing theme of this blog series on Madoff has been the perplexing and inconsistent manner, virtually to the point of arbitrariness and unfairness, with which Trustee Irving Picard has handled charities that invested with Madoff

Picard vs. Wilpons: does the pending trustee lawsuit chill meaningful opportunities for sales of interests by the Mets owners? - installment 58

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2011

This Installment will address the potential legal disabilities that exist under the New York Debtor and Creditor Law for the WilponKatz families, the owners of the New York Mets (collectively, the “Wilpon Interests”), in their effort to sell a minority interest(s) in the Mets, in light of the existence of the lawsuit against them (the “Wilpon Case”) by Irving Picard, the Trustee in the Bernard L. Madoff bankruptcy