We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 123

Massachusetts District Court explores the United States’ burden of proof argument on deductions of government settlements

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

On May 9, 2013, the US District Court of Massachusetts issued a Memorandum and Order in Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. v. United States

Obamacare: round 2

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2013

The greatest drama in the Supreme Court's last term came from the legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Health care reform's medical loss ratio rebates and their impact on employer group health plans

  • Snell & Wilmer
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2012

Now that the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “Act”), employers must move forward with implementation

Ohio Supreme Court rebuffs effort to narrow charitable use property exemption

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2007

Recently, the tax exemptions enjoyed by many non-profit organizations, particularly those in the health care industry, have been under increasingly close scrutiny

Are MRI machines exempt from sales and use tax?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

The Saga Continues . . . Taxpayers are again challenging the Pennsylvania sales tax treatment of MRI machines. However, this time the taxpayers are

Affinity Health Pty Ltd & Anor v Symbion Health Limited 2011 VSC 210

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 9 2011

Have you ever paused to wonder just how far your indemnity provisions might reach and who can enforce them?

The impact of the Supreme Court decision on health reform

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

The Supreme Court released its much anticipated ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) this morning

Seventh Circuit holds certain provider taxes paid by hospitals not fully reimbursable under medicare

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2012

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (the “Seventh Circuit” or the “Court”) upheld summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in a suit brought by nineteen Illinois hospitals (the “Hospitals”) over Medicare reimbursement of provider taxes paid by the Hospitals into a state Medicaid fund

Seventh Circuit holds that medical residents may qualify for student exception to FICA taxes

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2008

On September 23, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that medical residents may qualify for the student exception from the payment of taxes under the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) and that the determination of whether a medical resident qualifies for the student exception is to be made on a case-by-case basis

The “individual mandate” upheld under Congress’ power to tax; parts of Medicaid expansion upheld

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

In a split decision, the Supreme Court on June 28, 2012 upheld the Affordable Care Act’s (the ACA’s) “individual mandate,” which requires almost everyone to have health insurance coverage or pay a penalty