We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16

A duty to mine big data

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

We had another jury trial and thus were offline for a few weeks but it didn't take long to dig up something I hope you'll find of interest. I ran

Virginia adopts the Davidson rule (hopefully)

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

Virginia's highest court is the latest to wrestle with causation in asbestosmesothelioma cases. Ultimately reversing a judgment in favor of

Drawing the line on what is 'scientific knowledge'

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2012

Consider the following undisputed findings about a hypothetical substance and a hypothetical disease published in a wide variety of respected, peer-reviewed scientific journals

When, if ever, does "scientific knowledge" stop being scientific knowledge?

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 25 2012

Consider the following undisputed findings about a hypothetical substance and a hypothetical disease published in a wide variety of respected, peer-reviewed scientific journals

Untested hypotheses: only as strong as the expert witness

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 21 2012

Kuhn v. Wyeth Inc. one of the many hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-induced breast cancer claims unleashed after one arm of the U.S. Women's Health Initiative (WHI) revealed that the risks of HRT outweighed any benefits is another case in which a court has concluded that a reasonable though untested hypothesis is good enough for Daubert purposes

Gods of the analytical gaps

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2012

Kuhn v. Wyeth, one of the many hormone replacement therapy (HRT) - induced breast cancer claims unleashed after one arm of the WHI revealed that the risks of HRT outweighed any benefits, is another case in which a court has concluded that a reasonable though untested hypothesis is good enough for Daubert purposes

Judge Robreno just knocked unimpaired maritime plaintiffs out of the MDL

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2012

If you're a maritime plaintiff and are unimpaired mere pleural thickening won't save your asbestos claim

The can-can: How a Texas plaintiff found a way to causation

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2012

Out of various bits of data and a dollop of professional judgment the plaintiff's expert in a Texas medical malpractice case created a causal narrative that has survived on appeal

Kid! Be careful! Broken glass!

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

Bartlett v. Mutual, a Stevens-JohnsonToxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJSTEN) generic drug case that produced a $21 million judgment upheld on appeal, gave us writer's block

There's something about Nevada

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2012

After getting hammered in quick succession for $500 million, $162 million and $90 million worth of punitive damages in three cases involving a total of just five plaintiffs, Teva settled its Nevada hepatitis C (HCV) Propofol claims