We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,045

District court limits tiering of biological opinions

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

On December 5, 2014, a federal district court held that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) failed to comply with the Endangered Species Act

Federal Court of Canada affirms Crown consultation process following environmental assessment under CEAA 2012

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 17 2014

On December 9, 2014, the Federal Court of Canada (Court) released its decision in Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v. Minister of the Environment

Fifth District rejects CEQA challenge to Fresno County aggregate mine project EIR in partially published decision, clarifies State Mining Board’s SMARA powers and CEQA’s farmland loss mitigation rules

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 15 2014

In a lengthy, 65-page opinion filed December 8, 2014 (of which fully two-thirds was unpublished), the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the

The temperature rises: a hot summer in greenhouse gas regulation

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2014

The summer of 2014 sizzled in the field of greenhouse gas (GHG) regulation, with three key developments. First, the Environmental Protection Agency

Significant Louisiana environmental damages lawsuit against major energy companies remanded to state court

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 6 2014

On December 1, 2014, the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Judge Zainey presiding) issued a ruling in the case of The

Coal ash regulation update

  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2014

The U.S. EPA’s efforts to develop a new regulatory path for coal ash (“Coal Combustion Residuals” or “CCR”) by regulating the material either as a

Food, farming and land quarterly - Autumn 2014

  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 27 2014

On 21 October the gates came down and the RPA drew a line under transferring Single Payment Entitlements. The gates will lift in early 2015 and Basic

Ninth Circuit lifts the veil: explains how to comply with Endangered Species Act 60-day notice requirement

  • Nossaman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) imposes certain procedural hurdles on any would-be plaintiff commencing a citizen suit to compel compliance

Alberta Chief Justice keeps fracking lawsuit against environmental regulator alive

  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 24 2014

The Honourable Neil Wittman, Alberta's Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench, has ruled that a landowner is entitled to carry on her lawsuit

The myth of the regulatory gap: BLM’s proposed hydraulic fracturing rule compared to existing state law

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2014

For the better part of the last decade, oil and natural gas production from domestic wells has increased steadily. Technical advancements in