We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 16,598

“One step too far” Court shoots down the EEOC’s kitchen sink subpoena

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Employers have become accustomed to the federal courts rubber stamping EEOC subpoenas seeking company-wide information based on a single charge of

Fifth Circuit: no overtime pay for crewmember tankermen

  • King Krebs & Jurgens PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

On November 13, 2014, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Coffin v. Blessey Marine Services, Incorporated, Case No. 13-20144, that

Disclosing the identity of a complainant can constitute retaliation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed a decision of the Administrative Review Board of the Department of Labor

Texas federal court decision illustrates need for BYOD policies

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Saman Rajaee was a salesman for Design Tech Homes. He used his personal iPhone to connect to his employer's Microsoft Exchange Server, which allowed

Video interview: discussing the Fifth Circuit ruling on outing whistleblowers with LXBN TV

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Following up on our post, Steven J. Pearlman, co-chair of Proskauer's preeminent Whistleblowing & Retaliation practice group, spoke with Colin

Jury room becomes war zone for AutoZone: jury renders $185 million verdict against company for pregnancy discrimination

  • Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy & Ecker PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Last week, the jury in Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2012), awarded a former employee $872,000.00 in compensatory damages and $185

Non-compete and confidentiality clauses in a beverage maker’s contracts with a bottler and a consultant held to be unenforceable

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Courts will decline to enforce contractual restrictive covenants in agreements that unreasonably restrain trade or lack adequate consideration

Court enforces five-year noncompete agreement in connection with sale of business

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Employers drafting and seeking to enforce noncompete agreements struggle with structuring the temporal and geographic scope of the proposed

Court, not arbitrator, decides if arbitration proceeds as class claim

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

In Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal provided its most recent answer to a lingering questionwho

Ten actions you can take now to protect your company’s trade secrets action three: create a culture of confidentiality

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Today is the third installment of our series on actions that employers can take to prevent employee theft or improper disclosure of company data and