We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 15,396

Do your employment practices or D&O liability policies insure against immigration enforcement actions?

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Policyholders might expect that their employment practices liability andor directors' and officers' liability insurance policies would insure

EEOC guidance spotlights pregnancy discrimination in the workplace

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

With the passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Congress made it clear that discriminating against pregnant employees violates Title

Flexible working request extended to all employees

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Since 30 June, all employees with 26 weeks' service now have the right to request flexible working. The procedure for making such a request has also

Public sector unions take a hit in recent Supreme Court decision

  • LeClairRyan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

The United States Supreme Court recently held in Harris v. Quinn that the First Amendment protects certain "quasi-public" employees from being forced

U.S. Postal Service plays the terrorist card against whistleblower

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Retaliating against an employee for reporting safety violations, the U.S. Postal Service asserted baseless terrorism charges against him. As a result

California Supreme Court narrows commissioned salesperson exemption

  • Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Last week the California Supreme Court continued its trend of issuing employee-friendly decisions, this time in a case involving the commissioned

NLRB declines to appeal class action waivers to Supreme Court: what does it mean for employers?

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

On July 15, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) let its deadline to seek Supreme Court review of the Fifth's Circuit decision (D.R

Fifth Circuit confirms employer’s right to set workweek for payroll purposes

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

Employees may have an understanding of their own “work week” for various employment purposes based on different business practices or employer

Quirky question 235, payment of wages better late than never is half right

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2014

My company was in a tight spot last month with cash flow and we had to delay payroll by a few days. We did end up paying everyone what they were owed

One of these things is not like the others: some class representatives just don’t belong

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2014

A seemingly never ending wave of call center class actions has been leveled against employers in recent years. The hallmark of these suits invariably