We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16

Bystander employee can claim sexual harassment

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2009

Sexually offensive language need not be targeted at the plaintiff in order to support a claim of sexual harassment, according to a recent decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Blizzard v. Appliance Direct, Inc. (Fla. 5th DCA, August 7, 2009

Eleventh Circuit affirms sanctions against plaintiffs' firm for solicitation

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2009

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court's entry of sanctions against the Shavitz Law Group, one of the leading plaintiff-side FLSA firms in Florida

Intrastate passenger trips can trigger FLSA's motor carrier exemption, rules Eleventh Circuit

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2010

Drivers who transport passengers from airports to locations within the same state can be subject to the FLSA’s motor carrier exemption, according to a recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Abel v. Southern Shuttle Services, Inc., Case No. 10-10659 (11th Cir., September 21, 2010

Does Dees v. Hydradry leave employers high and dry in FLSA settlements? (part I)

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 1 2010

In Dees v. Hydradry, Case No. 8:09-cv-1405-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla., April 19, 2010), U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday issued a 29-page opinion that addresses the key issues pertaining to the settlement of FLSA cases in the Eleventh Circuit

Understanding the Eleventh Circuit's Polycarpe decision

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2010

Recently I reported that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping Services, Inc. will lead to an increase in the number of FLSA cases filed against small businesses in Florida

Flirtation and brief touchings are not sexual harassment, Eleventh Circuit rules

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2009

When does flirtation and touching by a supervisor cross the line into sexual harassment in violation of Title VII?

Eleventh Circuit weighs in on Florida non-compete law

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 12 2009

Florida law, specifically section 542.335, Florida statutes, generally authorizes courts to enforce non-compete and other post-employment restrictive covenants, provided the agreements are in writing and signed by the employees against whom enforcement is sought, are reasonable in time, area, and line of business, and are supported by one or more legitimate business interests supporting the restrictive covenants

Flirtation and brief touchings are not sexual harassment - or are they?

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2010

Is the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals going to reverse its decision in the controversial case of Corbitt v. Home Depot?

Understanding Florida's workers' compensation retaliation statute

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2010

A plaintiff who alleges that his employer terminated his employment in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim is entitled to proceed to trial, according to a recent decision by the Third District Court of Appeals, Ortega v. Engineering Systems Technology, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA, January 20, 2010

Eleventh Circuit rules for employees on FLSA enterprise coverage

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2010

In an important decision that will affect countless numbers of small businesses in Florida, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals today rejected the arguments of several employers that they were not subject to "enterprise coverage" under the Fair Labor Standards Act