We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

A summary of major developments in key areas

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Indonesia, Myanmar, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 7 2013

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and institutional bodies have published the following guidance in relation to corporate governance and

Final credits roll in iiNet trilogy

  • Hunt & Hunt
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 11 2012

In a landmark ruling on 20 April 2012, the High Court unanimously dismissed an appeal by 34 Australian and United States film and television studios against internet service provider (“ISP”) iiNet

Movie studios fail in appeal against internet service providers

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 10 2012

The High Court has unanimously decided that an internet service provider, iiNet, is not liable for authorising the copyright infringements by its users who downloaded movies on its network

iiNet's High Court win means ISPs must still tread carefully on copyright infringement

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 20 2012

Does an ISP have to prevent its customers from infringing copyright?

Federal Court continues to impose high penalties on SMS spammers

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 22 2010

The Australian Federal Court has imposed AU$6.5 million in penalties against two further respondents in proceedings brought by ACMA against SMS spammers