We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,156

Saul Louis Feraud Int’l., et al. v. Viewfinder Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2009

After an interesting and lengthy fair use analysis, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment because the court determined that there were unresolved factual issues relating to all four fair use factors

Deletion of Facebook page spoliation

  • Jackson Lewis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

A New Jersey District Court has sanctioned a personal injury plaintiff for spoliation following the plaintiff's deletion of his Facebook account

High Court finds Google not liable for misleading or engaging in deceptive conduct for displaying sponsored links

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 3 2013

On 6 February 2013, Australia's High Court reversed the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia which found that Google engaged

Complaint filed for conducting a web-based public offering

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 2 2007

On January 31, Massachusetts regulators filed an administrative complaint against Bulldog Investors General Partnership and affiliated entities thereof, as well as their principals, including Phillip Goldstein, alleging that the respondents engaged in an unregistered, non-exempt, public offering of securities in Massachusetts in violation of the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act (the Mass. Act

Settlement Google news case

  • Venable LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 29 2007

A highly publicized case that has been going on for the last two years in which the large international service, Agence France-Presse, sued Google Inc. claiming Google, through Google News, infringed on its copyrights was settled last week

Federal appeals court rules that county cannot collect occupancy taxes from online travel companies

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2009

On January 14, 2009, the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals released Pitt County v. Hotels.com, L.P. et al

Viacom International, Inc., et al. v. YouTube, Inc., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2009

The court accepted YouTube’s argument that documents from third-party BayTSP, a company hired by Viacom and other content owners to identify clients’ content on the Internet and send DMCA takedown notices, are relevant to YouTube’s defense and that producing such documents does not create an undue burden on BayTSP, and granted YouTube’s motion to compel BayTSP to produce the requested documents

Video-sharing website protected by DMCA safe harbor

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2009

In 2008, the video-sharing website Veoh.com (Veoh) won two notable decisions under the “safe harbor” provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA

User-generated content, online fair use and the DMCA’s “good faith” requirement

  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2009

Copyright law has always provided a balance between the proprietary rights of copyright owners and freedom of speech

Data privacy does not trump copyright protection says European Court of Justice

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Spain
  • -
  • February 25 2008

This European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision was in the context of unlawful music file sharing via the internet