Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 87

No “safe harbor” for BitTorrent website operator

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling in favor of seven film studios finding that the defendant induced

DMCA safe harbor analysis now the same in both Ninth and Second Circuits

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has withdrawn its 2011 opinion applying the "safe harbor" provision of the Digital Millennium

Vicarious copyright infringement requires a showing of supervision or control

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

In an opinion that elaborates on the degree of third-party supervision required in order to attach vicarious copyright infringement liability, the U.S

Question on web browsing and copyright infringement referred to CJEU

McDermott Will & Emery
-
Belarus, United Kingdom
-
April 30 2013

On 17 April 2013, the Supreme Court of England and Wales provisionally held in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v The Newspaper Licensing

Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
February 28 2013

Addressing the issue of obviousness of patents directed to Internet-based software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a

High Court rules no proprietary interest in e-mail content

McDermott Will & Emery
-
United Kingdom
-
December 6 2012

In Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins and Another 2012 EWHC 2952 (TCC) the High Court of England and Wales held that there is no proprietary interest in the content of e-mails

Web-linking is not necessarily copying

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
September 28 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has determined that an entity that provides a link to copyrighted material should not be held liable as a contributory copyright infringer if users of the site bookmarked, but did not upload, the copyrighted material to the site servers

Statutory provision on royalty judges violates appointments clause

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
August 30 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the position of Copyright Royalty Judges (CRJs) violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, but remedied the violation by invalidating and severing restrictions on the Librarian of Congress’s ability to remove the CRJs

Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent

How deep is the safe harbor?

McDermott Will & Emery
-
USA
-
May 30 2012

In a case that has now been in litigation for more than five years, and in an appeal that drew close to a hundred amici briefs, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has explained its position on the contours of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (DCMA's) safe harbor provision that limits the liability of online service providers who permit users to post content on their websites

next >

Search results

No “safe harbor” for BitTorrent website operator

DMCA safe harbor analysis now the same in both Ninth and Second Circuits

Vicarious copyright infringement requires a showing of supervision or control

Question on web browsing and copyright infringement referred to CJEU

Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet

High Court rules no proprietary interest in e-mail content

Web-linking is not necessarily copying

Statutory provision on royalty judges violates appointments clause

Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use

How deep is the safe harbor?

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea