We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 92,063

Unfairness does not necessarily equate to adverse action

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 23 2013

In this recent decision, the Federal Circuit Court made it clear that unfair conduct by an employer will not necessarily give the affected employee a

English court supports enforcement of arbitral award, granting worldwide injunction requiring disclosure of assets

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

This morning, Mr Justice Field handed down his decision in the case of Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Limited and others 2013 EWHC 1323

State law mandate to conduct criminal background check isn’t a shield to a disparate impact claim under Title VII

  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

A federal court in Ohio held in Waldon v. Cincinnati Public Schools (1:12-CV-00677) that an Ohio law (H.B. 190 effective 111407) requiring a

IP snapshot - May 2013

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

The Court of Appeal is to refer questions to the CJEU on the interpretation of the “Specific Mechanism” under the EU Accession treaties of 2004 and

Regulator's pursuit of market misconduct in Hong Kong top court delivers written judgment

  • RPC
  • -
  • Hong Kong
  • -
  • May 23 2013

As noted in my blog of 30 April, the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong ("the CFA") abruptly dismissed the appeal in Tiger Asia Management LLC & Ors

Court partially dismisses and denies conditional certification in tip-credit case

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

Anyone who has dined at a restaurant is aware of the importance of tipping, even if the exact rules, like the percentage and how it should be

Holder of deed need not be holder of note to foreclose, Georgia Supreme Court rules

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

The Georgia Supreme Court held this week that the holder of a security deed need not also hold the underlying note to exercise the power of sale in

The high court signals a narrowing in the interpretation of material adverse change

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

In a decision last month, the High Court considered the factors required to be taken into account by a Lender when deciding whether there has been a

Terms of service and deceased user’s account

  • Field Law LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

When a user dies, who owns the contents of that user's account? In Ajemian v. Yahoo Inc. (May 7, 2013), a Massachusetts court considered this

The relationship is governed by multiple agreements and not all require arbitration; must you arbitrate?

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2013

In the past few months, two federal appellate courts have had to determine whether parties were bound to arbitrate claims that arose from