We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

A further German chapter to the AdWord saga - the German Federal Supreme Court publishes the grounds to the decision in Bananabay II

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • August 1 2011

Last week, the German Federal Supreme Court published the grounds of its third trade mark decision concerning Google AdWords

Another win for perfume brands before the CJEU

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • July 23 2010

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has confirmed that perfume testers that were marked "Not for Sale" were not put on the market in the European Economic Area (EEA) by the marks' proprietors or with its consent in accordance with Article 13(1) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (EC) No 4094 (the Regulation)and Article 7(1) of the Trade Marks Directive (the Directive

German Federal Supreme Court sends adwords question to the ECJ

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • January 23 2009

Yesterday the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) published its keenly anticipated decisions on three adword cases

Broad-based database protection

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • October 28 2008

By their very nature, the exact scope of protection of sui generis rights in the field of intellectual property is hard to determine

The ECJ answers questions on small but perfectly formed trade mark use

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • March 1 2007

The ECJ delivered its responses to questions posed by the German court, in the Adam Opel trade mark case against Autec