We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-9 of 9

Time limits for court challenges - Uniplex (UK) Ltd v. NHS BSA

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 19 2010

On the same day as the Commission v. Ireland case, the CJEU handed down its judgment in Uniplex (UK) Ltd v. NHS Business Services Authority

Change in subcontractor Wall v Stadt Frankfurt am Main

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Wall v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Case C-9108, judgment of 13 April 2010), the CJEU held that a change of subcontractor (even if the possibility of a change is provided for in the contract) may in exceptional cases constitute a material amendment to the contract where the use of a particular subcontractor was a decisive factor in awarding the contract

Judgments of the General Court in cartel appeals regarding gas insulated switchgear

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 21 2011

On 3 March 2011, the EU's General Court reduced the fines of certain members of the gas insulated switchgear cartel but upheld the fine of 396.6 million imposed on Siemens

Time limits for court challenges - Commission v. Ireland

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, Ireland
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In its judgment of 28 January 2010 in Commission v. Ireland (Case C-45608), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that Order 84A of the Rules of the Superior Courts which sets out the procedure and timeframe for initiating a challenge to a procurement procedure is contrary to EU law

Participation in more than one tender - Serrantoni and Consorzio

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Serrantoni and Consorzio stabile edili (Case C-37608, judgment of 23 December 2009), the CJEU ruled that it is not an inherent breach of the principle of equal treatment for a consortium and a company, which is a member of that consortium, to separately bid in competition against each other in a tender

Development agreements - Helmut Muller v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Helmut Muller GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (Case C-45108, judgment of 25 March 2010), the CJEU clarified the application of the EU procurement rules to development agreements

Late tenders - European Dynamics v EMSA

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In the recent case of European Dynamics v European Maritime Safety Agency (Case T-7005, judgment of 2 March 2010), European Dynamics challenged two separate tender procedures of the EMSA and was successful in having one contract award annulled

Test case: we're all equal (but just not yet)!

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • Belgium, European Union
  • -
  • March 21 2011

On 1 March 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided the so-called Test Achats case on insurance premiums

CJEU judgment on compulsory healthcare schemes

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • March 21 2011

On 3 March 2011, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) handed down its judgment on a reference from a French district court asking whether a compulsory healthcare scheme in the French bakery sector was subject to competition law