We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 79

Mareva injunctions: they’re not just for pre-judgment anymore

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 2 2014

The Mareva injunction is a powerful tool for levelling the playing field when dealing with those who, left to their own devices, would dissipate

Mareva injunctions: they’re not just for pre-judgment anymore

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 2 2014

The Mareva injunction is a powerful tool for levelling the playing field when dealing with those who, left to their own devices, would dissipate

Canada - police may seize a computer without a warrant where they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent the imminent destruction of evidence

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 1 2014

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently issued a decision in which it found that a warrantless search of a household and seizure of a computer

Supreme Court of Canada confirms pregnant employees are entitled to two periods of “top up”

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 20 2014

On November 14, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a three sentence decision that has important implications for Canadian employers who provide

State of whistleblowing legislation in Canada

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 17 2014

In recent years, the lack of accountability and transparency of many public and private organizations has been forcefully brought to the forefront of

Attract strong executive candidates while protecting against executive misconduct

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 14 2014

Senior executives are sometimes indemnified against costs and expenses incurred as a result of legal proceedings that might be brought against such

Canada and Europe establish a Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) for accelerated examination

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, European Union
  • -
  • November 11 2014

On September 24, 2014, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) signed a Memorandum of Understanding

Supreme Court of Canada denies leave to non- injured plaintiffs seeking restitutionary remedies under the BPCPA and Competition Act

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 11 2014

On September 4, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (the “Supreme Court”) dismissed the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to appeal in a proposed class

When worlds collide: addressing off-duty employee misconduct

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 7 2014

Many believe that what employees do on their own time should not be regulated by employers, but the boundary between the workplace and an employee's

Settlement agreement confidentiality strongly enforced: former Globe and Mail columnist who was ordered to repay $209,912 now required to pay $30,000 in legal costs

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 4 2014

Our regular readers will recall a previous blog about the case involving Jan Wong, a former Globe and Mail columnist, who violated the