We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 363

Amendments to add multiple new defendants not allowed by Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2014

The plaintiff sought to amend its Statement of Claim to add new defendants, including some identified by name and 26 defendants identified as

Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta allows amendment to add individual defendant

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2014

In a breach of confidence and copyright infringement action in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, the plaintiff sought to add a claim against a

Quebec retailers will not be forced to add French to their signs

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2014

The Quebec Superior Court has ruled that the Office québécois de la langue française (“OQLF”) had no legal basis to force Quebec retailers to add a

Patent to an “expandable and contractible hose” found to be obvious

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2014

One of the plaintiffs in this patent infringement suit is the inventor of Canadian Patent No. 2,779,882, a patent that claims a compact garden hose

Hypothetical world when multiple s. 8 damages cases held not to reflect size of actual generic market

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

In May, 2012, the Federal Court quantified damages owed to Apotex pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations (decision here, summary here). Similarly

Appeals dismissed from quantification of s. 8 damages

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

As discussed above, in May 2012, the Federal Court quantified damages owed to Apotex and Teva pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations. (Teva decision

Appeal of the re-examination board’s decision dismissed: three claims rejected

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

This was an appeal of a decision of a Re-Examination Board cancelling three claims of Newco Tank Corp.’s (“Newco”) Canadian Patent No. 2,421,384 (the

Appeal upholds dismissal of request to amend pleadings due to proximity to trial

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

This case concerns an appeal of a motion to amend pleadings in the s. 8 case described above. The motion had originally been brought three months

Class action settlement agreement found to be ‘unfair’, ‘unreasonable’ and ‘not in the best interests of the class members’ Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, 2014 ONSC 1288

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 24 2014

In this certified class action, the Plaintiff, Lorne Waldman ("Waldman") brought a motion for approval of a settlement of a copyright infringement

Court of Appeal upholds decision to deny amendments to statement of defence in Section 8 proceeding Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2014 FCA 65

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 24 2014

This appeal was heard in the context of an action commenced by Teva Canada Limited (“Teva”) seeking compensation from Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. and