We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 971

Dealing with concurrency in construction delay claims

  • Al Tamimi & Company - Advocates and Legal Consultants
  • -
  • United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 24 2014

One of the most problematic issues relating to construction delay claims is that of concurrency. Indeed, concurrency causes problems for many of

TCC rules (ok)

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 11 2014

On a recent hearing involving (on the other side) a firm of solicitors who would in all probability decline any objection to being described as 'not

Beneficiaries of collateral warranties may now be able to enforce them more easily!

  • Winckworth Sherwood
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 10 2014

Contrary to the view of the industry, the Technology and Construction Court has recently held that in certain circumstances a collateral warranty may

Can a party be prevented from referring a dispute to adjudication

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 9 2014

This is Lord Woolman's summary of the question posed in T Clarke (Scotland) Limited v Mmaxx Underfloor Heating Limited click here, also described

Costs thrown away in adjudications: are they as irrecoverable as we think?

  • Thomson Geer
  • -
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 9 2014

A recent decision in the United Kingdom matter of National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside Board of Trustees v AEW Architects and Designers Ltd

Proportionate liability clauses are not inherently unfair

  • Taylor Wessing
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 8 2014

Proportionate liability clauses are a common feature in professional firms' engagement letters. But there has been very little case law on whether

West and another v Ian Finlay & Associates

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 8 2014

We reported on the first instance decision in Issue 155. In that decision, the Wests had previously been awarded damages and interest totalling £649

Competition update

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 7 2014

Firms active in the construction materials sector have been in the competition law spotlight for the past few years and will continue to be so. This

Net contribution clausesTCC decision in West v Ian Finlay turned on its head by Court of Appeal

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 4 2014

West v Ian Finlay & Associates (a firm) 2014 EWCA Civ 316, 2014 All ER (D) 281 (Mar)The claimants had retained the defendant architect during a

Silence is not golden

  • 1 Chancery Lane
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 3 2014

The Court of Appeal in PGF II SA v OMFS Co 2013 EWCA Civ 1288 considered the question of whether silence in the face of an invitation to mediate