We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,002

Court of Appeal upholds TCC decision on indemnity

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 24 2014

In Greenwich Millennium Village Limited v Essex Services Group PLC & Others, the Court of Appeal considered an indemnity clause in circumstances

A summary of major developments in key areas - general counsel update - July 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Legislation, in the form of a Regulation and Directive, has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union which will substantially

New judicial guidance as to the FIDIC suite of contracts

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 8 2014

The decision of Mr Justice Akenhead in Obrascon Huarte Lain v Gibraltar has provided valuable guidance as to how the English courts will interpret

It's the taking part that counts

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 3 2014

The Technology and Construction Court in Honeywell International Middle East Ltd v Meydan Group LLC 2014 EWHC 1344 (TCC) has dismissed an

Asset modelling to curb PFI disputes?

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 3 2014

In May 2011, the government published its Government Construction Strategy which called for 'a profound change in the relationship between public

Terminating a FIDIC contract: what’s in a notice?

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

Notices serve many important functions on construction projects. They are the means by which employers (usually acting through a contract

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Condek Holdings Ltd & Others

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 2 2014

The dispute here related to the design and construction of a car park in North Cheam. Two of the Defendants successfully brought applications to

Fitness for purpose obligations take precedence over specification

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 30 2014

In the recent case in the English High Court of MT Hojgaard v E. ON1, it was held that a fitness for purpose obligation in a construction contract

Duties to warn held at bay

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 26 2014

A recent TCC decision has rejected an attempt to extend the law as to tortious duties to warn. The case will be welcome news for sub-contractors in

Oksana Mul v Hutton Construction Ltd

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 26 2014

Ms Oksana Mul (“the Employer”) engaged Hutton Construction Ltd (“the Contractor”) to carry out substantial extension and refurbishment works (“the